이메일 #086 - #090
원본 출처: Satoshi - Sirius emails 2009-2011
이메일 #086
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:20:52 +0000
From: Satoshi Nakamoto <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Db::open/Db::close "Bad file descriptor" exception
To: Liberty Standard <[email protected]>
Cc: Martti Malmi <[email protected]>
영어 원문
I have an idea for a workaround, but it depends on what files the errors
are on. If you've accumulated several errors in db.log, could you send
it to me? (even if it's rather simple and boring) Is the file listed
always blkindex.dat, or does it include addr.dat or wallet.dat too?
Liberty Standard wrote:
> I moved the data directory back to my SSD card and started bitcoin test
> 6. It encountered a segmentation fault today with Db::open in the log. I
> had changed the settings to only use one processor/core while I watched
> a 720p mkv movie. I noticed the segmentation fault after the film had ended.
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Satoshi Nakamoto <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Here's one where I linked Berkeley DB a different way. It's worth a
> try. Otherwise identical to test5.
>
> (Keep the datadir on the hard drive at least until you get it to
> fail the same way there. That has a fair chance of success.)
>
>
이메일 #087
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:19:26 +0200
From: [email protected]
To: Satoshi Nakamoto <[email protected]>
Subject: Forum
영어 원문
I installed a TikiWiki on my VPS at 174.143.149.98. SSL is currently
enabled with a self-signed certificate. Admin password is the same as
in the Bitweaver. How about using this as the site platform? Maybe we
can make bitcoin.org or at least bitcoin.sf.net point there?
이메일 #088
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:34:56 +0000
From: Satoshi Nakamoto <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Forum
To: [email protected]
영어 원문
[email protected] wrote:
> I installed a TikiWiki on my VPS at 174.143.149.98. SSL is currently
> enabled with a self-signed certificate. Admin password is the same as in
> the Bitweaver. How about using this as the site platform? Maybe we can
> make bitcoin.org or at least bitcoin.sf.net point there?
What do you see as the benefits of switching the wiki?
Some I can think of:
SSL
get away from sourceforge's unreliable hosting
everything not logged by sourceforge
The forum feature is about as weak as bitweaver. We need a full blown
forum software for that.
My priority right now is to get a forum going, either phpBB or similar.
What do you think of the zetaboards option? Should we go ahead with that?
이메일 #089
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:11:24 +0200
From: [email protected]
To: Satoshi Nakamoto <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Forum
영어 원문
> What do you see as the benefits of switching the wiki?
> Some I can think of:
> SSL
> get away from sourceforge's unreliable hosting
> everything not logged by sourceforge
I think the biggest advantage is having a single site so you don't
need a separate account for the wiki and the forum, and the
functionalities are also nicely integrated with the main site itself.
Also being ad-free is a plus.
> The forum feature is about as weak as bitweaver. We need a full blown
> forum software for that.
How about Drupal's forum functionality? Address:
https://174.143.149.98/drupal/. The CMS in general looks better and
simpler than TikiWiki. If the forum's not good enough, then we can of
course use a specialized forum software like phpBB.
> My priority right now is to get a forum going, either phpBB or similar.
> What do you think of the zetaboards option? Should we go ahead with
> that?
Otherwise fine, but the ads and the lack of SSL are a minus.
이메일 #090
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:10:22 +0000
From: Satoshi Nakamoto <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Forum
To: [email protected]
영어 원문
That's a good idea to go in a more web-publishing CMS type direction
like Drupal. That's a better fit and can produce a better looking
website than a wiki. I think I was wrong about wiki. Only a few
specific people will do any website design work and those people can go
ahead and have a separate login. In that case, login integration with
the forum doesn't matter much. For security, I'd almost rather have a
different login than be constantly checking the forum with the same
login that could pwn the website.
Drupal's forum is less bad than the wikis, but still a long way from
something I would want to use.
zetaboards pros and cons:
pros:
- we don't have to worry about bandwidth
- they handle the backend management and security patches
con:
- lack of SSL
- lack of privacy, everything is logged
- lack of control over the php code for customization
- no CAPTCHA, and if they add one later it might be unacceptable flash
- ads (could pay to get rid of them later if we care enough)
- there's always the risk they abruptly cancel the site for some petty
reason
[email protected] wrote:
>> What do you see as the benefits of switching the wiki?
>> Some I can think of:
>> SSL
>> get away from sourceforge's unreliable hosting
>> everything not logged by sourceforge
>
> I think the biggest advantage is having a single site so you don't need
> a separate account for the wiki and the forum, and the functionalities
> are also nicely integrated with the main site itself. Also being ad-free
> is a plus.
>
>> The forum feature is about as weak as bitweaver. We need a full blown
>> forum software for that.
>
> How about Drupal's forum functionality? Address:
> https://174.143.149.98/drupal/. The CMS in general looks better and
> simpler than TikiWiki. If the forum's not good enough, then we can of
> course use a specialized forum software like phpBB.
>
>> My priority right now is to get a forum going, either phpBB or similar.
>> What do you think of the zetaboards option? Should we go ahead with
>> that?
>
> Otherwise fine, but the ads and the lack of SSL are a minus.
>